Thursday, November 7, 2024

G.M. Malliet

Agatha Award-winning G.M. Malliet is the acclaimed author of three traditional mystery series and a standalone novel set in England. The first entry in the DCI St. Just series, Death of a Cozy Writer, won the Agatha Award for Best First Novel and was nominated for many awards, including the Macavity and the Anthony.

The Rev. Max Tudor series has similarly been nominated for many awards as have several of her short stories appearing in Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine and The Strand.

Mailliet's new DCI St. Just mystery is Death and the Old Master.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

Titles are nearly as important as covers. It is one of the pleasures of browsing a bookstore that you can be drawn to a book you never knew you wanted by its title alone.

I’ve been lucky with being able to keep my original ideas for book titles. I believe I’ve never had an editor request an alternative title except in the case of the St. Just books. “Marketing,” a term for a generally anonymous, behind-the-curtain group in publishing, wanted every title in the series to begin with “Death.” (The series began with Death of a Cozy Writer.) After six books, all this “Death” is getting a bit morbid, but I’m stuck with it now, and I do see the wisdom of making it easier for readers to find me.

I have a title I really love for Book #7. I won’t say what it is, lest I break my lucky streak.

Choosing titles is the fun part, however, even given that constraint. Death and the Old Master, a title with layers of meaning, suggested itself to me in a chicken/egg fashion, and became integral to the plot. DCI St. Just is based in Cambridge, and the story concerns an aging master of a fictional Cambridge college called Hardwick. The master is an art expert who acquires a painting that may or may not be by an Old Master.

What's in a name?

Names are so crucial to getting the character to gel. In the same way the title has to be right, and sometimes goes through a few tryouts, the name has to fit the character.

Or perhaps be so at odds with the character that it’s a bit of a tipoff they may be up to no good.

I bless whoever invented the search/replace feature in word processing that makes these tryouts possible. I suppose back in the day before typewriters, authors had to decide immediately on the character name and stick to it.

I especially have fun with the sort of hyphenated names the British nobility go in for, like Eliza Snodgrass-Chickenwire or something, but this time my college master’s name is simply Sir Flyte Rascallian. He is a bit of an isolated, lonely figure—a brilliant academic, of course, and the best in his field, much in demand to weigh in on the value of artworks found behind dust covers in the attics of the rich and famous.

I became quite attached to my old master and sad because I knew early on I’d have to kill him off. The same goes for the next character to die in the book, whose name I won’t reveal.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

Endings are harder because in the puzzle-type mysteries I write, there tend to be a lot of characters and motives, and bringing all the strands together like Viking braids at the end is difficult. I’m sure this is why Agatha Christie liked the technique of gathering everyone in the drawing room, so Hercule Poirot could explain how he reached his conclusions.

I’ve used the gathering technique more than once. I do try to vary things, but honestly, it’s the simplest and most straightforward way to explain very complicated plots.

I never change beginnings. Once it’s there on the page it’s pretty much set in concrete.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

My series heroes (Max Tudor, St. Just, and Augusta Hawke) are a bit like me because they are all seekers after truth and justice—crusaders, if you like. My characters have traits—greed, fear, hope, kindness, self-delusion—that most of us share, but it’s a question of degree.

My favorite characters to write are narcissists or charismatics, the kind who lead cults. I’ve had a fair amount of experience with those, and they are endlessly fascinating.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

The daily news is an endless source of inspiration, particularly the metro section of my local paper, which happens to be The Washington Post. I get a lot of plot ideas from reading about the scammers and embezzlers, not to mention the politicians who never seem to learn. There was recently quite a horrible murder that occurred near me that will end up, in some distorted fashion designed to protect the innocent, in one of my stories. It has all the elements of a Christie plot.
Visit G. M. Malliet's website, Facebook page, and Instagram home.

The Page 69 Test: A Fatal Winter.

The Page 69 Test: The Haunted Season.

Writers Read: G.M. Malliet (April 2017).

--Marshal Zeringue

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Michael Wendroff

Michael Wendroff is an author and marketing consultant, and has an MBA from NYU. His background is running marketing and advertising for Fortune 500 companies, and he now runs a global consulting practice (one of his clients is a $4 billion firm headquartered in India). He has homes in New York City and Sarasota.

Wendroff's new novel is What Goes Around.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

I think my title, What Goes Around, does quite a lot. First, I believe potential readers complete the thought (Comes Around), and immediately involving your readers in a "conversation" puts you ahead of the game. It also piques interest, as the immediate questions raised are what occurred that requires retribution, and what will occur for the "comes around." Lastly, it sounds like a thriller, and indeed the reader will be taken through very thrilling twists and turns.

Note, this wasn't the original name of the book. Its draft name was The Perennial Plan, which ties into the surprising ending. But my publisher, who is great, thought we could do better, and the team there came up with What Goes Around, which is much much better.

What's in a name?

All of the character names in my novel are purposeful.

Jack Ludlum is an amalgam of Jack Reacher (my male protagonist is very similar, at least to start) and Robert Ludlum, the best-selling author of the Bourne novels, etc. It's a homage to both--in fact I stayed at Robert Ludlum's house when I was very young, and watched him write his 400+ page novels by hand on yellow legal pads. Luckily, I was able to write What Goes Around on a pc!

There are other characters in my novel, like Officer Nefesh and Chief Gil Gulim, whose names mean something vital to the story in another language--but I won't reveal that until you've read the book!

Lastly, the evil doers in my novel, Incels, white supremascists, etc., as well as some of the good guys like FBI agents, are all named after a form of real people's names that have been involved in the different groups.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your new novel?

I don't think my teenage self would be surprised at all. I was a voracious reader of thrillers because my stepfather, now deceased, was a literary agent, so I got all his clients books for free and devoured them --in fact, I read the little known first ever novel by Dean Koontz, called After The Last Race.

I started college, NYU, at 16, and while I took plenty of English classes, I was in the business school. It was when I received my MBA, I combined my two loves, as I wrote my thesis on "Marketing in the Publishing Industry." The industry's trade journal, Publishers Weekly, published excerpts from it, so I actually got paid for my thesis!

But the most fun I had in writing the thesis was interviewing editors at the major publishing houses. In fact, once I had to interview Michael Korda, who was then Editor-in-Chief at Simon & Schuster, and he kept me waiting quite some time. But when he finally opened his door, who walks out but Truman Capote! Lots of fun meeting him.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

They are both equal for me, because they share similarities. My goal is to make the reader never want to stop reading, to force the reader to want to keep turning pages. I do that by having a cliffhanger ending on almost all chapters. The cliffhanger can be physical, psychological, or emotional. Then, I try to make the first sentence of the next chapter very intriguing. So the endings and beginnings are written to achieve the same objective.

Of course, my favorite ending is when I've written the story out, have fully edited it, and can then finally write, The End.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

I definitely see myself in some characters--I have the same birthmark and same situation that arose as one of my key characters.

Most of my characters though, are a world apart from me, and required my doing tons of research. I think the best form of research is actually talking to people involved in the various professions, which I did. I don't think I spoke to a serial killer, but then again...

I also found the connection an author has with his characters to be quite interesting. I became very emotionally involved with some of them. In fact, there was one that my plot outline called for killing off, but I just couldn't do it. No, I'm not crazy. Well, maybe a little.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

This book was inspired by what happened the moment I was born. I was put on my mother's chest, she looked deeply into my eyes, and she said, "Nice to see you, again."

The "again" part always intrigued me, and since I always wanted to write a thriller, I knew someday I would combine the two. And I did!
Visit Michael Wendroff's website.

The Page 69 Test: What Goes Around.

--Marshal Zeringue

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Marilyn Simon Rothstein

Marilyn Simon Rothstein is the author of four novels: Who Loves You Best, Crazy To Leave You, Husbands And Other Sharp Objects, and Lift And Separate. She grew up in New York City, earned a degree in journalism from NYU, began her writing career at Seventeen magazine, married a man she met in an elevator and owned an award-winning advertising agency for more than twenty-five years.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

I think the title --along with the cover--makes it clear Who Loves You Best is a warm and humorous contemporary story and that there is a competition going on. From the cover, it’s also clear that the people in the book wear shoes.

The working title for Who Loves You Best was Battle of the Bubbies.

What's in a name?

A lot. I go for names of people who are gone but meant and still mean, a lot to me. Often, I utilize someone’s name to say thank you for being there for me. In my first two books, the main character is Marcy Hammer. Hammer is my mother’s maiden name. In Crazy to Leave You, Lauren Leo is the protagonist. Leo was my dad’s name. His nickname was Honest Leo.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your new novel?

Shocked. As a teen, I could never have imagined myself as a woman with the life experience to write about older mothers, adult daughters and too many grandmothers.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings?

Endings are the most difficult for me. On the other hand, not one of my four books begins with the words I originally envisioned.

Which do you change more?

It’s probably a tie. I can rewrite the beginning or the ending endless times. Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

My characters are of my world. The protagonists have a sense of humor, lean on the ability to laugh while experiencing sadness and sorrow. I do that a lot.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

My idea of research is going to lunch with my daughters. Or, walking around the reservoir with a friend. Or, listening in intensely while at Starbucks. Do not sit in Starbucks telling your secrets to a friend. I like to listen in.
Visit Marilyn Simon Rothstein's website.

The Page 69 Test: Who Loves You Best.

--Marshal Zeringue

Monday, October 28, 2024

Tony Wirt

Tony Wirt was born in Lake Mills, IA, and got his first taste of publication in first grade, when his essay on Airplane II: The Sequel appeared in the Lake Mills Elementary School’s Creative Courier.

He's a graduate of the University of Iowa and spent nine years doing media relations in the Hawkeye Athletic Department. He's also been a sportswriter, movie ticket taker and Dairy Queen ice cream slinger who can still do the little curly thing on top of a soft serve cone.

He currently lives in Rochester, MN, with his wife and two daughters.

Wirt's new novel is Pike Island.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

Most of the excitement in Pike Island takes place on Pike Island, so I think the title puts readers right in the middle of the action. I always thought the name of the island would be a great title for the book, unfortunately, the real place I set this book is called Mystery Island, and that sounds way too much like something out of an episode of Scooby Doo. So my agent, my editor, and I put our heads together to think up a new name that sounded both realistic and a little spooky.

What's in a name?

Not much, honestly. I never name any of my main characters after anyone. Minor characters, however, I'll sometimes toss in a mixture of old friend's names. In an early draft I had a character named after an obscure Minnesota Indie Rapper, but by the time the book sold and was published, Lizzo's career had exploded and she definitely didn't fit the 'obscure' description.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your new novel?

Half of the story in Pike Island revolves around a group of guys on a trip to the lake. While no character is based on me and my group of friends individually, they are definitely inspired by the group dynamic we had. We took many trips up to my grandparent's cabin together, so I definitely mined those memories for some color.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

I don't outline things out, but I usually have an ending in mind when I start. The beginning usually changes more, because I'm always looking for a better way to hook the reader.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

I think there's always some of the author in their characters. For me, there's usually a lot of me in the early drafts, but with each re-write the characters establish more of their own personality and act like themselves instead of me.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

I always listen to music when I write, and each book tends to feed off a different genre. Pike Island needed a lot of 80s and 90s College Rock (R.E.M., Husker Du, The Replacements). My book Just Stay Away fed off of Hall of Fame hip-hop (A Tribe Called Quest, Erik B & Rakim, Wu Tang Clan). I never know what a particular book is going to need.
Visit Tony Wirt's website.

The Page 69 Test: Pike Island.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, October 26, 2024

J. T. Ellison

J.T. Ellison is the New York Times and USA Today bestselling author of more than thirty novels and the Emmy Award–winning cohost of the literary TV show A Word on Words. She also writes urban fantasy under the pen name Joss Walker.

With millions of books in print, her work has won critical acclaim and prestigious awards. Her titles have been optioned for television and published in twenty-eight countries.

Ellison's new novel is A Very Bad Thing.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

I think it’s a rather straightforward title, quite literal and easy to understand, as it sets the stakes for the whole story from the jump. It was not the first title I entertained—mine rarely are—but it was one of the first lines I wrote for the book. It starts with a letter. My darling daughter. Many years ago, I did a very bad thing. Even I wanted to know what that very bad thing was, and what I thought wasn’t what it ended up being. So I tricked myself! Columbia Jones is an author, and she’s killed in the opening pages of the book. The letter gives us a peek into her mind, one of the few we get, as the story revolves around the people closest to her, the ones with motive to kill her.

What's in a name?

I have exactly zero idea how or why, but I was starting to think about my next book, and I tend to journal quite a bit as I do so. There’s an entry on November 26, 2021, that says only Columbia Jones. It just appeared, handed to me by the writing gods. I followed on quickly with Who killed Columbia Jones? Columbia Jones. Totally unique first name coupled with a very common last name—it’s actually the perfect moniker to represent the two sides of my main character—public and private. I do like a unique androgynous name, though. It allows the reader to create an impression of the character in their head right away. Naming all my characters I something I take seriously. They’re your children in many ways. They need just the right one.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your novel?

I think my teenage self would be shocked, honestly, because she would be so thrilled and grateful to realize she’d fulfilled her lifelong dream of being a writer on such a big stage. She was still writing poetry and just learning how metaphor and simile worked. To see a complete manuscript—and know it was the 30th published novel? I think she’d be pretty darn happy and proud.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

The beginnings are always harder—in that they take longer. Setting the stage is everything for a crime fiction novel. You must open with a question, establish the stakes, introduce the characters, and if you’re doing it with a standalone, you’re recreating the wheel every time. It usually takes me six months to write a book—five months for the first half and a month for the second half.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

Every character, the good, the bad, the sinister, the sweet, is a little piece of me. They have to be; they live in my head and talk all the time. My challenge is to allow myself into the heads of characters who are nothing like me. I lead a quiet, boring life. I’ve been married to a great guy for 30+ years; I have a wonderful family, loving parents, and a simple, regular existence. But there’s drama in the edges of everything, and I have to go searching to find it, make it mine, identify with it, and bring it to the page in a relatable way.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

  Everything influences my writing, from the news cycle to cold cases to overheard snatches of conversation. Music is always a big player, from lyrics that create titles to sweeping symphonies that encapsulate the story for me. I read and watch everything I can, too, which helps!
Visit J.T. Ellison's website and follow her on Twitter or Facebook.

The Page 69 Test: Edge of Black.

The Page 69 Test: When Shadows Fall.

My Book, The Movie: When Shadows Fall.

My Book, The Movie: What Lies Behind.

The Page 69 Test: What Lies Behind.

The Page 69 Test: No One Knows.

My Book, The Movie: No One Knows.

The Page 69 Test: Lie to Me.

My Book, The Movie: Good Girls Lie.

The Page 69 Test: Good Girls Lie.

Writers Read: J. T. Ellison (January 2020).

--Marshal Zeringue

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

Galina Vromen

Galina Vromen began writing fiction after more than twenty years as an international journalist in Israel, England, the Netherlands, France, and Mexico. After a career with Reuters News Agency, she moved to the nonprofit sector as a director at the Harold Grinspoon Foundation.

Vromen launched and directed two reading readiness programs in Israel, one in Hebrew (Sifriyat Pijama) and one in Arabic (Maktabat al-Fanoos). During her tenure, the two programs gifted twenty million books to young children and their families and were named US Library of Congress honorees for best practices in promoting literacy.

Vromen’s stories have been performed on NPR’s Selected Shorts program and appeared in magazines such as American Way, the Adirondack Review, Tikkun, and Reform Judaism. She has an MA in literature from Bar-Ilan University in Israel and a BA in media and anthropology from Hampshire College in Massachusetts.

The author and her husband divide their time between Israel and Massachusetts.

Vromen's new novel is Hill of Secrets.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

Hill of Secrets is very much about secrets — personal and national ones. And it takes place in Los Alamos, New Mexico, a mesa (flat-topped hill) which was where the world's first atomic bombs were built, and arguably the most secret place in the United States in the 20th century. So, yes, I think the title takes the reader right into the heart of the story. In the book, all the main characters have their own personal secrets, except for one — a teenager — who very much wants to know everyone else's secrets, or at least thinks she does.

My original title was Nuclear Families, since the book is about family life for those living at Los Alamos during the war, but the publisher didn't like it. There was a lot of back and forth and it was my husband who came up with a title we could all agree on.

What's in a name?

The last name of the German Jewish refugee family in the book is actually the family name of some of my own relatives. My main consideration in the first names of the characters was to make sure the main characters have names that start with a different letter from each other.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your novel?

My teenage self would not have been surprised by the novel. She probably would have related very well to the teenage character, Gertie, and she would have probably paid particular attention to the steamy sections, as teenagers are wont to do. Like Gertie, my teenage self tended to get along better with adults than with kids my own age. She would have been pleased that the novel actually got written because, even then, she wanted to be writer.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

I find beginnings much harder to write. I kept changing my first chapter because I have two main characters — Christine, a 30-something woman who had to stop her career to join her husband at Los Alamos, and Gertie, a teenage Jewish German refugee — and each chapter starts with the point of view of a different character. Initially, Gertie had the first chapter, but I was afraid the book would be classified as a young adult book if it started with a teenage point of view, so I switched to Christine. I must have written the opening scene at least 20 times.

I did change the ending somewhat, to make it more open ended. Some readers find this unsatisfying; they want more closure, but I am very comfortable with leaving the reader wondering what might or might not happen next and whether secrets are a good thing or not. To my mind, it makes the book more thought provoking and it raises questions that have no easy answer.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

I certainly drew on my teenage self in depicting Gertie although I was probably not as curious as I make her out to be. In general, though, I prefer to write about characters who are not related to me. Just like most actors do not want to be type cast — I don't like to effectively type cast myself in my writing. So the further away I get from myself, the happier I am as a writer, because that is when I really let my imagination soar, when I try to see the world through the eyes of someone who is different from me, which is interesting and also challenging.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

Politics definitely influenced me. As far back as I can remember, I have worried about nuclear war. I grew up during the Cold War of the 1960s and the concept of mutually assured destruction, which dominated US-Soviet relations at the time, seemed to me even then both a dangerous and stupid way to conduct ourselves. As a child, I remember school drills where we would have to line up with our backs to our lockers in the hallway — in case of a nuclear attack! Today, it is ludicrous to think that anyone could have possibly believed this would keep us safe. I suspect it was intended to inculcate in us a fear of nuclear war and of the Soviet enemy, while simultaneously encouraging a totally unfounded belief that we could protect ourselves from an attack by standing rigidly against our lockers in the hallway of our school. The origins of that arms race started to some extent with Los Alamos. In recent years, I have been very worried about the potential for nuclear war in the Middle East and the horrific damage it could inflict.
Visit Galina Vromen's website.

The Page 69 Test: Hill of Secrets.

My Book, The Movie: Hill of Secrets.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, October 19, 2024

Sydney Graves

Sydney Graves is a pseudonym for Kate Christensen, an Arizona native and the author of eight novels, most recently Welcome Home, Stranger. Her fourth novel, The Great Man, won the 2008 PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction. She has also published two food-centric memoirs, Blue Plate Special and How to Cook a Moose, which won the 2016 Maine Literary Award for Memoir. Her essays, reviews, and short pieces have appeared in a wide variety of publications and anthologies. She lives with her husband and their two dogs in Taos, New Mexico.

Graves's new book is The Arizona Triangle: A Jo Bailen Detective Novel.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

The word Arizona tells the reader where the book is set. It's an economical way to invite her into the book's world, and it's also a lovely state name. Arizona carries metaphorical implications too, the romance of the west, the visual of dramatic mountains against deep blue sky and saguaro silhouettes, so it instantly gives the reader so much of the atmosphere the book is imbued with.

The word Triangle does double duty, as a play on the Bermuda Triangle, a place of danger and mystery, as well as a reference to the love triangle at the heart of the mystery.

What's in a name?

I wanted Jo Bailen's name to work on several levels. First, she's queer and mixed-race, and both vulnerable and strong. I chose Jo because, of course, we all associate that name with the invincible heroine of Little Women. It's a plausibly masculine name with a feminine spelling, and I liked the interplay of those two qualities. Her last name is a Spanish name, not a Mexican one. Her Mexican-based family is offensively proud of their European heritage, and I wanted a name that reflected Europe rather than Mexico, and that also had an English pronunciation, because her mother is Anglo. Jo deplores her Mexican relatives for their racism and wants nothing to do with them, just as her late father didn't. In terms of naming her, I wanted to get at the contradictions and depths of her character. And I also like the way Jo Bailen looks on the page, from an aesthetic standpoint. It’s a very good name for a detective.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your new novel?

When I was a teenager, I was an avid, passionate fan of Agatha Christie, Dorothy L. Sayers, and Dick Francis. My teenage self would be absolutely thrilled to know that she would someday be publishing her own detective series. In part, I wrote this book for her.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

Beginnings are harder. Ironically though, I also find beginnings more fun. Starting a book opens a world of possibility, suggestion, intrigue, and interesting characters. By the time I get to the ending, I already know what's going to happen, so it's a matter of wrapping up what I've said in motion rather than a thrilling process of discovery.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

All of my characters contain parts of myself, and all of them have qualities I don't, both traits I wish I had and ones I'm glad I don't have. I try to create flawed and complex people who feel as real as anyone we know.
Visit Sydney Graves's website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Stephanie Booth

Stephanie Booth has an M.A. in English from the University of New Mexico and an MFA in Creative Writing from Emerson College. Her work has appeared in Cosmopolitan, Real Simple, O, Marie Claire, The Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. Booth has been a contributing editor at Teen People and an advice columnist for Teen, and she has helped with casting for MTV’s award-winning documentary series, True Life.

Her new novel is Libby Lost and Found.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

My original title was The Falling Children Find Their Way Home, which is a nod to the mega-best-selling fantasy book series, The Falling Children, that the main character, Libby Weeks, writes. It took a lot of soul-searching to admit that while I was fond of the title, it wasn't the best entrance into the story.

Libby Lost and Found kinda says it all: Libby has been recently diagnosed with early-onset dementia and feels absolutely adrift in her life. But as she enlists her biggest superfan, an 11-year-old girl named Peanut Bixton, to help her finish her last book in the Falling Children series, they both find parts of themselves they didn't know existed.

So...some heartbreak, but not all heartbreak!

What's in a name?

When I first started writing, the main character's name was Elizabeth. But I started thinking that it felt too competent, if that makes sense. Libby is softer. It sounds like a character in a nursery rhyme or the name of a favorite stuffed rabbit -- something you want to care for. And there's an intentional meekness to her last name, "Weeks."

Libby's 11-year-old sidekick is Peanut Bixton. I wish I could trace back the roots of that name, but it just popped in my head one day. (Maybe there's an unconscious nod there to Turtle Wexler in The Westing Game?) Peanut's the opposite of Libby and her name conveys that. It's odd and doesn't easily roll off the tongue.You have to think about Peanut Bixton as you say it.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your new novel?

My teenage self would be too busy getting in trouble to notice this book. There were a few years of my adolescence where I didn't do a lot of reading. But my younger kid self would be thrilled! And probably have a bunch of notes and questions.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

To me, the beginning of a story feels like a house that I have to circle hundreds or thousands of times — in the dead of night! Without a flashlight!— before I find a way in. For Libby Lost and Found, that entrance wasn't where I thought I was. I hit so many dead-ends until a sentence formed in my head one day on a walk: "The Children are still in the forest." I kept hearing that, and each time I did, another sentence would be attached to it. That became the prologue and helped me understand, "Oh, this is a story within a story." It's not just Libby's life which is in crisis, but her fictional characters.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

Every character in this book feels so alive and distinct from me. I felt like a fly on the wall, watching them go about their lives and hoping they wouldn't notice me.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

There are so many ways I could answer this question, but I'll go with this: Research shows that the average person processes 74GB of information every day, or the equivalent of 16 movies. So what do our brains do with all that information? Where does it put the scrap of conversation you overheard, the SNL joke that made you laugh, the song lyric that won't leave your head, the person who sped by you on the highway who was clearly eating a bowl of hot oatmeal.... I love imagining that writing is your unconscious spinning all this data into something distinct and meaningful.

So in answer to your question...Keeping an open mind, because inspiration is everywhere.
Visit Stephanie Booth's website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Monday, October 14, 2024

Rachel Robbins

Rachel Robbins received her MFA from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. She is a tenured assistant professor at Malcolm X College, one of the City Colleges of Chicago. A visual artist and two-time Pushcart Prize-nominated writer, her paintings have materialized on public transit, children’s daycare centers, and Chicago’s Magnificent Mile. Robbins is the author of In Lieu of Flowers and The Sound of a Thousand Stars. She lives in Chicago with her husband, children, and Portuguese Water dog.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

My original working title was actually Enola Spelled Backwards, which was a nod to the Enola Gay. I thought it was fascinating that Paul Tibbets, the pilot who flew the aircraft that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, named the plane after his mother Enola, who was named for the titular character in the novel Enola: Or Her Fatal Mistake, by Mary Young Ridenbaugh. I loved the self-fulfilling prophecy in that name; when it was reflected in the water over the Pacific, the nose of the plane would spell out the word alone. That’s why I also wrote the storyline of my Japanese character, a Hibakusha who has survived the bomb and must suffer its consequences, in reverse. Through his eyes, we time travel backwards, beginning with the toll the bomb has taken on his world by the end of his life, all the way back to its horrific inception.

In the end, we landed on the title, The Sound of a Thousand Stars, because it connected thematically. I liked that it was a nod to Fred J. Olivi’s famous words on the evening news after the bombing of Nagasaki: “Suddenly, the light of a thousand suns illuminated the cockpit.” It’s also apt because it’s a nod to understanding the world through numbers, and the book is inspired by my grandfather, who was always solving math riddles and quizzing us on square roots. Finally, it’s a paradox. Because there’s no sound in space, so stars don’t make sound. These scientists were driven to explore beyond the known universe—to hear things that had never been heard before.

What's in a name?

I named my protagonist Alice initially because it just felt right. Early on, there’s a character in the novel who scoffs: “I feel like Alice in Quantum Land.” And the puzzle pieces fell into place. What was Los Alamos if not a rabbit hole? I also needed to change surnames to protect my family’s privacy since in early drafts, I had used our family names. I updated Kahn to Katz, which felt appropriately erudite for a Jewish heiress to the de Young fortune. The other character is Caleb Blum, who began as Caleb Fisher. I chose Blum because I loved that it was the Yiddish word for flower since there is so much in the book about toxic oleander blooming in Hiroshima in the aftermath of the bomb. In the novel, Caleb explains that his last name was given to his family at the Romanian border by a Border Patrol Agent who had an affinity for gardening. This story is actually true. My paternal great-grandfather did not have a surname when they emigrated. They were too poor. We became the Fisher family because a Border Patrol Agent asked my great-grandfather whether he liked to fish, and not speaking a word of English, he responded in Yiddish, “Yo.” In the end, flowers seemed more poetic than fish.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your novel?

My teenage self was largely oblivious to my grandfather’s lived history and the plight of his work in defense. To me, he was my grandfather with twinkling eyes. I loved him so much. He was larger than life—a flawless being. So, the most shocking part of my book for my teenage self would be the removal of those rose-colored glasses and seeing my grandfather for who he really was—a person with ego, fear, flaws and all, who got caught up in something. I would have to reckon with his inherent faults—the same misgivings that make us human.

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

I wrote a whole storyline in reverse, so I suppose I have to say endings are my thing. Starting at the end and working backwards is kind of my process. I started writing the book itself on the flight home from my grandfather’s funeral, so that’s kind of the ultimate ending because the book began with a death. For me, it was a way of processing the loss and keeping my grandfather present. I also got to know him as a young person through archival documents and interviews, and that was a bit like meeting a ghost. I started having dreams about him as a young man. That’s a beginning I could never have written from the get-go.

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

My grandmother is the inspiration for my Alice character, and my grandfather is the inspiration for Caleb. But I spent so much time researching these amazing Herculean women scientists. They were called that, of course, because the term scientist was presumed to be male. And I was so taken with them—from stories about being restricted from experiments for fear of what the radiation would do to their reproductive organs, to proving useful in the end because their small hands could more effectively manipulate machine parts. So, my main character morphed from my grandmother—a philanthropist who wrote a book about the bomb and spent her life vying for a peaceful future—into a steminist scientist inspired by these lived histories. I suppose I’m in there a bit too because how could I not be? Every character is an iteration of the author, right? But I was able to maintain a distance from my own identity in the writing. It was primarily my grandparents that I envisioned coming to life on the page.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

Mostly, I’m influenced by visual art since I’m also a painter. I paint large-scale murals and work with collage, so I’m inspired by enormous stories walking across buildings, like the kinds done by Vhils (a Portuguese street artist who uses a jackhammer to chip away at walls), or Blu, an Italian painter who turns whole abandoned city blocks into paintings that he then animates. Both are extremely narrative in their work. Vhils tells the story of displaced people, celebrating the portraiture of those who have been removed from their homes, be it from railway construction or gentrification. And Blu tells stories that take on everything from evolution and gun violence to corporate greed.

Another of my favorites is Mickalene Thomas. Her collage work is so maximalist and fabulous. It’s a celebration of seeing. I love that she refuses the male gaze and depicts female subjects who possess their own sexuality and relish being seen. In many ways, my book started with similar visuals since I spent so much time painting my grandmother over and over, collaging in her letters and her fabrics, inspired by Thomas, and searching for answers as I always do in the beginning, through paint.
Visit Rachel Robbins's website.

The Page 69 Test: The Sound of a Thousand Stars.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, October 12, 2024

Eugenie Montague

Eugenie Montague received her MFA in fiction from the University of California, Irvine. Her short fiction has been published by NPR, Mid-American Review, Faultline, Fiction Southeast, Amazon and Flash Friday, a flash-fiction series from Tin House and the Guardian Books Network, and was selected by Amy Hempel for The Best Small Fictions (2017). She currently lives in El Paso, Texas with her family.

Montague's new novel is Swallow the Ghost.

My Q&A with the author:

How much work does your title do to take readers into the story?

I like what my super-smart and talented friend and writer, Brendan Park, has to say about titles: that they should open up rather than shut down, evoke, rather than diagnose. And, actually, he suggested the title here. I had originally chosen another title, and my (also super-smart and talented) editors encouraged a change. When I mentioned that I needed a new title to Brendan, he recommended "swallow the ghost," which came from a line in the book. The specific sentence the title comes from did not make it into the final book, but I think Swallow the Ghost is a title that begins to make sense within the context of the novel and that it works on both plot and thematic levels.

What's in a name?

With almost all of my writing, I hear a rhythm in my head. I wouldn't be able to pinpoint it. It's not related to pentameters or syllables or stresses on any conscious level; but when I write a sentence, it either sounds right or wrong to me, and I'll edit over and over until it sounds "right" in my head. I have a similar relationship to names. A character name either feels right or it doesn't. Sometimes that comes immediately, but I often change them over and over as I write (which can lead to some funny "Replace All" situations down the road). My "office" is a desk a closet--not a walk-in closet, just a normal closet with the doors taken off. It has a shelf on the back wall for sweaters and such that I have filled with books. The name "Jesse Haber" came about when I looked up at that shelf and saw a book by Jesse Ball and one by Mark Haber, and put them together—mainly to survive the sentence. But this name felt instantly right and I never changed it.

How surprised would your teenage reader self be by your novel?

What an interesting question—I've never thought about it. But, no, I don't think she would be very surprised. She might be surprised she finished a novel, but I think the themes and subject matter would seem of a kind. Hopefully, she would see some growth from how she thought about them at sixteen though!

Do you find it harder to write beginnings or endings? Which do you change more?

I think this might depend on the story or the book but, I have always found middles pretty difficult. I generally subscribe to the notion that if the ending isn't working, the problem lies somewhere else. I do think endings and beginnings can feel hard to change, so it's good to have a trusted reader to help you see it. There are some snake-eating-its-own-tail aspects of revision for me; I write from the beginning and at some point realize what I am doing (hopefully), so then I have to go back and incorporate what I have learned into the beginning of the book, which refines the middle and the end—again making it necessary to work on the beginning. At some point, this process ends or at least, the amount and importance of what I have to revise or refine approaches zero (if never actually getting there).

Do you see much of yourself in your characters? Do they have any connection to your personality, or are they a world apart?

I think there are aspects of myself in my characters, especially major characters. It's not a one for one certainly and it's not autobiographical, but the major characters are likely guided by or interested in at least some of the questions that I have about the world and art and other people, though their path and personalities and how they go about trying to answer these questions may differ.

What non-literary inspirations have influenced your writing?

Well, for this book, certainly the internet, and I do think about the internet a lot. There’s infinite creativity working within the formal structures of the tweet or the Instagram story, or the Tik Tok; in the same way, for centuries, writers have been playing with the novel. For example, Alena Smith, who created the TV show Dickinson, had a number of fake Twitter accounts, including Tween Hobo: tweets in the voice of a tween who was riding the rails; also Eighties Man (self explanatory). I also had friends who were always playing with Wikipedia, and a friend who once started a crime story on Yelp. The character left reviews at restaurants that were part of the story, slightly more narrative than one would usually leave. No one really noticed but, then, he left a review where there was a shootout—and the restaurant very much noticed, and he got kicked off Yelp. So I was thinking about all these things, and the little I knew about the publishing industry from being mostly an outsider; I wrote but had not had a book published, but I followed writers on Twitter who posted about the shrinking media market, less places for reviews, the importance of follower counts in the process, et cetera. All of this was in my head when I thought about Jane and Jeremy and this Twitter mystery they created to help promote Jeremy's book.

I also thought about the internet in how we read. There are the radical differences in tone, fragments, but also there's this contingency. It’s fairly common now to read a text, and then there’s the think piece on the text, and then there’s the twitter thread on the think piece, and then maybe there’s a new think piece on the twitter thread. Along with that, there’s the whole milkshake duck of it all—that one day we’re all laughing at something online, new information comes out, and we realize we shouldn’t be laughing. So, there’s this instability that's more a part of the reading process, as I experience it, and this is mirrored by the instability of all the platforms, which are subject to the whims of a few billionaires, really. A book is never stable, the reading changes with each reader, even the same reader at different times--but this cycle on the internet, specifically, there's a Rashomon aspect about it that I thought about with this book.
Visit Eugenie Montague's website.

--Marshal Zeringue